I had my radiator replaced. The new radiator was defective so the shop replaced it again. Now, less than a month later, my upper hose blew. The shop claims that this was not covered since they did not replace the hoses.
I was never asked about the hoses since I assumed they were included in the replacement of the radiator. The shop claims that they did not feel the hoses required replacement.
Given that the car has 128,000 miles and that the hoses had to be disconnected and reconnected twice, I find this argument a bit ridiculous.
I am fairly comfortable that bad judgement was used by the shop, but I wanted to know if it would be standard service to replace the hoses with the radiator.
I paid about $550 for the new radiator and now they expect me to pay $125 for the upper hose.
Thoughts?
I was never asked about the hoses since I assumed they were included in the replacement of the radiator. The shop claims that they did not feel the hoses required replacement.
Given that the car has 128,000 miles and that the hoses had to be disconnected and reconnected twice, I find this argument a bit ridiculous.
I am fairly comfortable that bad judgement was used by the shop, but I wanted to know if it would be standard service to replace the hoses with the radiator.
I paid about $550 for the new radiator and now they expect me to pay $125 for the upper hose.
Thoughts?
Aug 25, 2009 at 6:49 AM